Posts Tagged ‘real estate contract’

Understand a Real Estate Contract Without Breaking a Sweat

January 28th, 2011


One of the tools used in the business of real estate is the use of contracts. However, not many people understand what the contract is all about or the purpose of having one.? There should be no excuse for a seasoned expert or a rank beginner from not knowing or understanding the contract.?

A person who wants to invest in a real estate property should be know the basics of a real estate contract because the basis behind this contract came from the “common law contract principles.”? In most states, real estate agents and lawyers make use of standardized contracts like Counteroffer and Acceptance and Offer. The term offer refers to the contract that is being drafted. Meanwhile, the buyer is the one who usually signs this offer. A “mutual assent” or “meeting of minds” should take place in order for the contract to become effective. Remember that unless the seller formally accepts its terms and conditions, the contract does not bind. Acceptance of the contract happens if the seller already agrees to the terms of the buyer. Counteroffer takes place when a seller negotiates with the buyer. But if the seller does not accept the offer during the given time frame and manner that the buyer set, no contract happened at all. For instance, the contract says that the acceptance must be made through facsimile, the acceptance made through telephone call or mail is still unacceptable.?

There are two kinds of real estate contracts- bi-lateral contract and unilateral contract. When you speak of bi-lateral agreement, it means that there is a consensus between the buyer and the seller since the seller agrees that he or she will sell his or her property while the buyer assures the seller that he or she will buy the property. The second type which is the unilateral contract means the seller has given the obligation to sell while the buyer has an option of buying the property or not.?

Any prospective buyer should know the basic and legal requirements that should be present in order to consider the contract as a valid one. ?

The first requirement is that there should be a mutual agreement that took place. Second, the purchase and sale of the real estate contract should be in a writing form for it to be considered as enforceable. Otherwise, if the agreement only happens in a verbally and one of the parties (buyer and seller) decides not to push through with the deal, either the buyer or the seller will be unlucky of the deal. Third, the contract should identify who are the parties involved in the deal. Even if the law does not require it, the full names and even the middle initials should be present in the contract; if one party is a corporation, the name of the company should also appear in the contract. Third requirement is that, the specific property should be identified, otherwise if the description of the property is vague, there is no binding contract. The contract should also include the property’s purchase price and a consideration which comes in the form of a benefit, value, or interest that includes promise. Lastly, for the contract to be enforceable, the parties should have their signatures present on it. The signature of a witness or notary is not required but if there is a facsimile signature, it will only be acceptable if the contract says that the facsimile signatures that appear are valid.

By: Gary Allalouf

About the Author:
Gary writes for http://www.myhawaiirealestateonline.com where you can find Hawaii real estate for sale in the all the major islands. Review real estate in Oahu along with great oahu real estate listings.



Arizona Real Estate Contracts and the Statute of Frauds

January 21st, 2011


General principles of Arizona contract law simply require the existence of an offer, acceptance, consideration, and sufficient specificity of the terms in order to have an enforceable contract. This is true whether or not the parties write out the terms and/or sign a written document.

This is not the case when the contract concerns the sale of real property. There, the Statute of Frauds as codified in Arizona (ARS 44-101(6)) demands that contracts for the sale of real property be written and signed in order to be enforceable.

It is important to note, however, that the Arizona courts have consistently held that only the signature of the “party to be charged” is required. In other words, the contract must be signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought but does not necessarily have to be signed by the charging party. For example, a seller of real estate who never signed the sales contract may successfully maintain an action against a buyer who did sign the contract.

The parties to an Arizona real estate contract should also remember that any amendments to the contract must also be written and signed to be enforceable. Because of the requirements of the Statute of Frauds, parties buying or selling real estate in Arizona are advised to demand written confirmation of all the terms and conditions of the real estate transaction. Frequently, agents and brokers may make representations and assurances to buyers and sellers and suggest that a written modification is unnecessary. Buyers and sellers should avoid the temptation to rely upon such assurances and ensure that all important matters are reduced to writing and signed by the other party.

Unfortunately, many Arizona real estate contracts are not written and/or signed and one or more parties find themselves with a need to seek relief from another party. If you find yourself facing such a situation you should consult with an experienced Arizona real estate lawyer as soon as possible to determine whether an exception to the Statute of Frauds might apply, or if some other legal recourse is available.

By: Kevin R. Harper

About the Author:
Kevin R. Harper is an Arizona real estate and business litigation attorney, representing individuals and small businesses throughout the state of Arizona from his centrally-located office at 1 N. Central Ave., Suite 1130, in downtown Phoenix.

For more information about Arizona real estate law, feel free to contact Harper Law PLC at 602-738-2090, or visit the firm online at http://www.HarperLawArizona.com

Copyright 2008 Harper Law PLC, all rights reserved.

The above article is designed for informational purposes only and, because every situation is different, is not intended as definitive legal advice. You should not act upon this information without seeking independent legal advice about your individual situation.



Understanding the Real Estate Contract

January 3rd, 2011


The real estate contract can be basically described as the document that bears the agreement behind any real estate transaction, whether that be the sale or purchase of a property, the lease of a property or any other transaction of that sort. Failure to understand the real estate contract can cause a lot of pain to the parties to real estate transactions who do so. This is because most disputes that arise in the course of real estate transactions (like where one parties feels that they are being ‘misused’) tend to turn out to be cases caused by failure to properly understand the real estate contract.

Normally, real0estate contracts are prepared by the ‘dominant’ parties in property transactions – and then presented to the other parties ‘for signing.’ The word ‘dominant’ here is used to refer to the parties who appear to have more ‘power’ in the transaction. Of course, the ideal situation would be to have the real estate contract prepared by an uninterested third party, say a law firm consensually contracted by both parties to the property transaction to oversee it. The reality however, tends to be that the real-estate contract ends up being prepared by one party (naturally biasing it somehow in their favor) and then just presented to the other party for signing.

In the situation where you are the party preparing the property contract, there would be little reason to worry, because you have control over what goes into the contract, and what doesn’t. The problem, however, is where you happen to be the party for whom the real estate contract is being prepared, and where all that is expected for you to do is just to sign on the dotted line – and get the transaction moving.

In this case where you are the party for whom the property contract is being prepared, it would be essential for you to ensure that you go through the contract with a tooth comb, scouring it for any clauses that may be injurious to your interests, before signing on the dotted line. This means overcoming the lazy feeling that you should just sign on the real estate contract and get done with it: because such an action has often driven people into great regrets. True, the other party (the party that prepared the contract) may not be very happy about your scouring through the document so thoroughly, but there is little else you can do – and you should not even consider signing on a property contract you have not really understood.

While you should not expect to have a perfect real estate contract (one that has absolutely no negative clauses) there should be a clear boundary that you shouldn’t go beyond, in terms of compromising on your interests. And if you happen to come across such truly injurious clauses in your bid to understand the property contract, you should not fear telling the other party to amend the contract, and neither should you sign on such an obviously flawed contract, even if it means pulling out of the deal.

By: Jamie Gram

About the Author:
To understand real estate contracts more, please visit our site http://www.simplerealestatecontract.com.